On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:40:23 PM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > I did a test with it and see it could be very useful when you need, for > instance, to create a contents navigator for e-pubs with deep, complex, > logical structures. >
Yea, that was the intention. ... I still think the existing "tab" mechanism should be the preferred way to create TOCs for new users, because it automagically creates "meta-data" that is useful (for future use), without the user even being aware... Using fields adds complexity and adds to the learning curve. eg: new UI was needed to make the workflow easier. ... So I'd recommend it, for more experienced users. I'm also a big fan of "visual" information. eg: tags :). So I try to avoid "hidden" information, and even be "vocal" against it. ... But IMO tocP enables a new TOC categorys. ... Just the "visual" output of the macros has potential, to be improved ;) > Some cases, like many novels, for instance, tagging is not relevant and > actually confuses the issue. > > Their strict ordering is needed but not categorization. > > So I like this both for its utility and its logical clarity. > Good summary! -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/213fc6cb-3d31-4021-8980-2d3eb98fa1d5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
