Josiah,

I had noticed Erwan's Community Search. 
> <http://erwanm.github.io/tw-community-search/> But I never used it much 
> because (1) its very incomplete, (2) way behind now, (3) has lots of links 
> that go nowhere (deceased links, old).
>
> What I did NOT know till I read your post was that folk with online stuff 
> need to do a couple of things to get it to track their work. *In other 
> words it is tardy simply because so few people are signed onto it*.
>
> My 1st question is basic: DO PEOPLE WHO ARE DEVELOPING STUFF EVEN KNOW 
> THIS MECHANISM EXISTS?
>


That is why the Community Search is not enough per se. It aims to help 
people find stuff but if people don't even find the Community Search... no 
cigar. This is why I keep coming back to TWederation. That is a system that 
builds on personal incentives and social interaction. It is a LOT easier to 
add notes if I do it for my own sake than it is to actively share them. For 
example, just the fact that you have plugins X, Y and Z installed are of 
potential value, if others knew. You have those plugins because of personal 
incentives. If you also happen to, say, blog for others to read, I think 
this is also more likely if you do it in your own TW than e.g here on the 
boards where you are not in control of your text. 

You ask "Do developers know about the Community Search?". Not unless 
anybody told them. And there is not enough personal incentive to do so, or 
even to keep the Community Search in mind. (for example, you knew about it 
but still don't talk about it... not out of evilness but I'm guessing 
your're of course not thinking of it much.) Besides, few people have as 
much time as you and I to write on boards like this. Definitely a luxury.

Other than the boards, I'd say people only "read" tiddlywiki.com. But the 
Community Search is presented on tiddlywiki.com just like any other 
community site/plugin/whatever. It is not "promoted" or referred to in any 
other tiddler that I know of. So, my guess is newcomers simply don't get to 
know about it. Jeremy is the gatekeeper to tiddlywiki .com and he is doing 
a fantastic job, but he is only one man and IMO simply adding a tiddler for 
each reported site is not enough. There is no categorization or context to 
find the info in. And the links are not updated. Besides, his super skills 
are better used on advanced stuff.

...so again, TWedreation, driven by "the masses" is my best shot for an 
answer to this information-spreading problem.


My 2nd question is: Why are we not doing more to ACTIVELY PROMOTE such 
> tracking of developments in TW Erwan's thing already makes possible?
>

I try to bring it up on the discussion forum every now and then (like now). 
But, there is also some mental resistance to do this because the Community 
Search is not designed the way I would personally have preferred it. The 
biggest problem is that is appears outdated and the HUGE thing that it 
actually updates EVERY day is too subtle.

But, yeah, you knew about it. You're one of the more active fellas here. 
And still you're not actively promoting it. Why?
 

My 3rd question is:  Why are *you* not using it :-) 
>

As noted, I typically create a new site (a tiddlyspot) for each new 
creation. And one has to report every site to the Community Search OR 
report one "main site" into which one writes the other urls. I do have my 
"blog" TWaddle reported... but TWaddle became passive a year or two ago 
(because there was no good mechanism to save only public/ready posts. I 
recently solved this and I'm fiddling aournd with a revamp for TWaddle.) so 
reporting each new thingy I make is... ufff... 

TWederation is also the only thing I can think of where each person himself 
decides how the data is to be presented, since it is in their own TWs. "I 
want to prioritize all fetched posts from Josiah", "I want to delete all 
posts not starred", etc. "I want an alert every time I fetch tiddlers 
containing the word plugin". Can't do that here or on tiddlywiki.com.


<:-) 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/899b012b-0402-4007-a561-ee2ba98378a1%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to