Maybe ... the _canonical_uri image tiddlers could carry the copyright/licensing credits and display them when displayed singly. But not display them when used as transclusions in other tiddlers.
Mark On Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 4:47:36 AM UTC-7, PMario wrote: > > On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 8:44:56 PM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> >> The one part of my original question that hasn't got answer is IF its >> possible, at the moment, to move a tiddler such that in a new TW with a >> "copyright" or "license" field could be forced to show. That would be >> important. >> > > Hmmm, > > As an author you can't and imo shouldn't try to *force* anything on your > users. IMO that's the wrong way to bind your users. That's why DRM > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_rights_management> has failed. IMO > the only way to bind your users is superior content. > > If we have an open license or free license, the "free" is meant like *freedom > to use* and not as in "free beer". ... Forcing something on someone has > nothing to do with freedom for me. > > If I'm forced to do something in an open source environment, my reaction > is like this: "I don't use the stuff!" It's as simple as that. ... because > "*I'm > free, to do that!*" > > just some thoughts > -m > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9001a650-b81b-4316-a862-5919d3ab2c6c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
