I think Thomas makes the killer point ... I find the idea appealing to include a field "license" and maybe a field > "copyright" with my name/website. The information in these fields should be > visible in the SVG tiddler without any additional macro or copyright > tiddlers in view mode – but invisible when it is used/transcluded in my > plugin interface. >
Burying copyright inside the SVG seems to me coping strategy, not fairness. I think it would be far better to have an EXPLICIT, visible, link. Yes, SVG supports a copyright string, but I think in TW we can have a more universal approach too that can apply globally on license/copyright issues. The one part of my original question that hasn't got answer is IF its possible, at the moment, to move a tiddler such that in a new TW with a "copyright" or "license" field could be forced to show. That would be important. Regarding it being a "management nightmare" to go this way I can't see the issue. To me its seems minimalist & workable & pretty fair. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/21148583-408b-4b55-93d0-55cddc8f31eb%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
