To use your expression, why get into combobulations for something that's not a problem yet?
Why would anyone expect documentation for something that (A) isn't a problem and (B) has no well-defined solutions? That doesn't mean the group shouldn't be thinking about it, of course. Once solutions are figured out, Jeremy won't have to worry about documentation (other than approving it). I'm sure one or more of us will step up to the plate. Mark On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 7:42:31 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao Mark S. > > You hit exactly the Catch-22. > > Mark S. Beginning to happen? Where? >> > > Its OBVIOUS that Firefox 57 will cause grief. > > Tiddlywiki.com is NOT a medium for that updateness. @Jermolene is one > person and I am unhappy seeing EVERYTHING we don't deal with being dumped > on him. In any case its NOT updated that much. > > But, neither, it appears is ANYWHERE ELSE MAKING IT FOR NEWBIES. > > J, x > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/bd9da80f-1385-4d9e-a6bc-0d7be8e2deb4%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
