Ciao RichardWilliamSmith wrote:

... it's something of a folly to mourn the obsolescence of software. Tempus 
fugit.

Let's not get too *hastus terminatus* before its time.

The point I was making is a valid one, I think: I use TW in a browser WITH 
other extensions. TW is NOT in isolation. It's simply a fact that FF 
developed an extremely good extensions API that *WebExtensions is a hollow 
shadow of*. Having to CLOSE DOWN FIREFOX extensions is something I do NOT 
want to have to do. It will cause me a lot of work finding another way. 
And, as of yet, I can't see ANY viable justification on limiting file 
saving for those extensions other than some weird ideology that has taken 
hold beyond reason. 

Your idea FF 57 is the Bees Knees is perhaps correct in terms of temporary 
performance improvements. The outcome, as far as I can see, is it will 
steal a few people from Chrome (as it imitates it) whilst throwing its 
uniqueness out the window. 

Lets discuss the usage figures next March.

Best wishes
Josiah

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/cfc4fdb6-b02a-4288-bfa2-db66d9225a1a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to