On Wednesday, 4 October 2017 22:34:35 UTC+5:30, Rob Hoelz wrote: > > > > That being said, I was looking through the Web Extensions APIs, and it > looks like the downloads API > <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/WebExtensions/API/downloads> > could potentially be used to implement some of TiddlyFox's functionality. > It means you would need to keep your tiddlywiki.html file under your > Downloads folder, but it's better than nothing. > > -Rob >
This is what I was thinking. Have anyone tried to workaround the limitation of Downloads folder? As in, via symlinks? What I meant to say is, if I decide to keep all my TWs in a single folder, and that folder has a symlink in Downloads folder, can Tiddlyfox continue saving?. It would be a hack, but it would be better than nothing. I have switched my Knowledgebase to TiddlyServer already. However, with all its benefits, it has some comfortable features missing. For example with tiddlyfox I can just download an empty wiki, open it and test something, save it and when done with its use, discard it without a second thought. With TiddlyServer, I have to ensure I add it to the settings files, restart the server and finally remove it when done, or restrict myself to the same path. I hope Arlen would someday look into a feature by which all files in a particular folder is loaded as standalone TW, so we can put the empty file in that folder. Until then, I would miss TFox. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/096749a1-db5b-4bea-8aad-f743ad0c2365%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
