Found it;

<$list filter=<<menufilter>> variable=null>


Works, note no " "


Regards

Tony


On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 12:09:59 PM UTC+11, TonyM wrote:
>
> Mark and all,
>
> Still no success, what ever is causing this intransigence of tiddlywiki, 
> whilst it may have something to do with my ignorance it is an example of 
> where tiddlywikis syntax and pecularities need review.
>
> All I wanted for Christmas (not really) was the ability to provide a 
> filter into a list statement using fields and variables. nothing more.
>
> See some of my experiments below, with alternate filter formats listed 
> until I change them.
>
> I refactored the code so the list uses a value passed into a macro eg; 
> [is[current]tag[working]]
>
> <$list filter="$menufilter$" variable=null>
>
> also
> <$list filter="<menufilter>" variable=null>
>
> also
> <$list filter="[prefix<menufilter>suffix<menufilter>]" variable=null>
> is never true OR disrupts menubutton
>
> is[current]tag[working]
> Never true
> <$list filter="[prefix<menufilter>suffix<menufilter>]" variable=null>
>
> Always true
> <$list filter="[<menufilter>]" variable=null>
>
> Never true
> <$list filter="[field:title<menufilter>]" variable=null>
>
> Always true
> <$list filter="field:title<menufilter>" variable=null>
>
> [is[current]tag[working]]
> <$list filter="field:title<menufilter>" variable=null>
> Always true
>
>
> <$list filter="[field:title<menufilter>]" variable=null>
> Never true
>
>
> Argggh
> Tony
>
>
> On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 8:11:14 AM UTC+11, Mark S. wrote:
>>
>> A small number of filter operators don't really filter -- they ignore 
>> anything earlier in the filter chain and create their own stream of items. 
>> These operators are called constructors.
>>
>> The prefix/suffix trick comes about because there isn't an equals 
>> operator, exactly. You could use field:title<variable> perhaps. That should 
>> work as long as the tiddler actually exists. I kind of like the 
>> prefix/suffix thing because it works even if the tiddler doesn't work (like 
>> if you were looking for a particular tag, which isn't also a tiddler). 
>>
>> -- Mark
>>
>> On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 12:56:30 PM UTC-8, TonyM wrote:
>>>
>>> Mark,
>>>
>>> That special use of prefix suffix again, I really can't understand the 
>>> tiddlywiki.com entries on selector constructors.
>>>
>>> Thanks mark I will test it soon and include the missing <
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Tony
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8e71dc9c-8c5e-408a-b6b5-5efbad47c7de%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to