On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 9:13:07 PM UTC+1, Michael Gentry wrote: > > Uni-links looks useful but only gets me about halfway there, I think. It > looks like in order to make it work universally across a wiki, you'd have > to manually add an alias field to every tiddler, which is not feasible in > my particular case. (Also I'd want to suppress the "this tiddler has the > following aliases" footer.) >
The footer is configurable. > The LooseLinks plugin, assuming I'm understanding it correctly, allowed > case-folded links to work without requiring any modifications to the target > tiddler, and without requiring any different link syntax besides plain > double-brackets [[ ]]. It may be that's just not feasible in TiddlyWiki > 5.x? > It would be a new plugin. ... In your OP you posted: [[worksheet]], [[Worksheet]], [[WorkSheet]], [[WORKSHEET]], and > [[wOrKsHeEt]] would all link to the same tiddler "Worksheet". I would immediately ask: - Why should the link point to the tiddler: Worksheet and not worksheet? - What if both Worksheet and worksheet exist? - What if we have [[test]] and [[text]], where only 1 character is different, but both are probably valid? ... - How can we detect the "missing tiddler" name. ... It would create 5 missing tiddlers: [[worksheet]], [[Worksheet]], [[WorkSheet]], [[WORKSHEET]], and [[wOrKsHeEt]] All of those things are different to the default core behaviour. ... So I'm not really convinced. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ee410f21-a3dc-4adf-9621-d6118c9546b0%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
