Thanks Jed, You have done two things for me, provided a resonable solution and confirmed I was not imagining things.
With respect to all the greatness of tiddlywiki this is to me a gap that must be filled, because I for one, and I suspect many others, expected a more direct approach to exist, so its absence was screwing with my mind, it took months for me to be able to even ask this simple question and in the mean time I have run down many rabit holes for many hours not to mention, once desperate, posting in the forum wondering why the solutions were never strait forward. Unfortunatly intelegent people expect or assume that such simple requirements can already be satisfied in a consistent and comprehencive way in any sophisticated tool. I am comming to expect I will find a few more as my expertise grows but such gaps really make the learning curve much steeper. I expect this issue alone complicates a lot of user coding, but is also forcing solutions to be convoluted. It is insidious because it is almost imposible to craft search keywords for something that is missing. I would like to be corrected if I am wrong about this but I would prefer it to be fixed. Thank you and Regards Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/31c653b5-ebee-4c62-81f7-9bdd539f2d12%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
