I believe that we are counting in opposite directions. In the way I was counting the 0th parent would be the current tiddler.
The biggest problem I can see with what you are suggesting where the 0th parent is the outermost tiddler is that the numbering changes when you transclude a tiddler. If you don't have your indexing based on the layer where the calling happens than I think it would be very delicate because you couldn't display the tiddler anywhere else without changing the numbering. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0c931e15-a940-401b-b718-e0706fe74121%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
