I am probably going to go with a name that isn't descriptive to just avoid the problem. I am leaning toward TiddlyFoule because it is seems like it could be descriptive without actually telling you anything about what it does.
And the question about splitting it up is probably most meaningful in terms of if there is some reason to not have all the functionality available. Like Hans said, there is no reason to use all of it if you don't need it. Would it be better to just have the conversion between single file and html wikis and not immediately save your changes for some reason? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f1a1abfa-5545-464a-90a8-53714ebc17c2%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
