Odd associations mainly. It wasn't meant as a heavy comment. And I think the number of people who understand "back-end" in its ribald sense here is probably low. I actually think its not bad.
However, looking over that pretty vast list I'm not sure its quite right either. HOWEVER, I completely get the pattern needs to emerge and shape a bit yet. I'm interested to see how it develops. The discussion was fascinating--the conceptual complexities. The table with the dropdowns is neat. Best wishes Josiah On Friday, 11 May 2018 20:30:46 UTC+2, Mat wrote: > > @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> Ermmm? >> >> Are you really sure you want to call this "Back End"? >> > > Not good? Because of funny associations or is it misleading? According to > wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_and_back_ends>... > > > <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/04bc1178-8c9e-4eee-a976-3d725758837d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
