Hear, hear, I really can understand you plea for the excecutable
Also great Stobot, that you were trying out multi-acces feature.I will have 36 people in the audience end of May so I could divide them in groups, actually hope that everocy can bring his laptop in the theatre. If something is going amiss, well that will teach us something, of course I''l forewarn the group, that this is just version 01. They're supposed to be the kind of people who are very inquisitve, so there really seems no harm in it. If anybody else would try out multi-acces with a group of people adding tiddlers, just starting new tiddler, write some text and close it again to save, then I surely would love to hear about the results. Tschüß, Edm. = = = = = = = . . Op zondag 13 mei 2018 14:05:52 UTC+2 schreef Stobot: > > Jed - again thank you so much > > I'm seeing the same thing as Ed with the settings - noticing on both > toolbars and the "fluid story" setting which I always change. > > As far as users, the best I was able to test was at work with 8 of us. I > setup a edit-text and button to add tiddlers and had all of us add as much > as we could, as fast as we could. Worked flawlessly under those conditions > - even with people all over the country, some connecting in via VPN to be > on-network. I agree that simultaneous edits would be a tougher test, but I > plan to design somewhat around that to mitigate it a bit. > > Arlen mentioned "don't need executable" - so for what it's worth I feel > much differently :) I've been using TiddlyWiki a very long time and relied > heavily on TiddlyLock back in what are now the "classic days" for all of my > multi-editor wikis. Not until your plugin did I have something that works, > and was simple enough to understand for a casual non-IT windows user. I > read this community's comments every day and I know the ones most vocal > have the knowledge to handle the "normal" solution, but I've been > completely lost when trying to figure out any of the other server variants, > and I assume I'm not alone, though I certainly *feel* like I'm in the > minority. People like me know 0 javascript, know very little about git > (have only interacted with it to download your executable) and know very > little about how servers work etc. Regardless of my constraints, I've > introduced *hundreds* of people at my company alone to TiddlyWiki. I only > rant about this because I really want TiddlyWiki to grow and thrive, and I > want to make sure the community has a full picture of who their audience > is. I suspect if we took the number or readers of this Google Group and > subtracted the number of contributors, we'd find a lot like me. > > All of which is to say I'm very thankful that you Jed - and the rest of > the contributors continue to support this awesome software! > > On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 7:11:58 AM UTC-4, Jed Carty wrote: >> >> Xavier, >> >> Every time I fix something some old bug comes back. Thank you for letting >> me know, I will try and find it. We may get Bob 1.0.1 sooner than I hoped. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a4e6c88e-dcea-4cd5-9544-16ddb5a50bb3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
