Hi Josiah,
I have to note that marking which of those support TWc is ambivalent if
other tools, that are for TWc only, are not listed, but if it's ok to add
those than I'd vote for it. Still, this can be confusing: like if
"encryption" is marked green it won't mean it is supported for TWc without
a separate plugin; and with a separate plugin, the support may be different
from that for TW5.
Perhaps TiddlyChrome should be mentioned in the same section as TiddlyFox
("Potential candidates").
This is a single-editor project, isn't it? Or some collaborators can be
added?
Best regards,
Yakov.
воскресенье, 3 июня 2018 г., 16:09:14 UTC+3 пользователь @TiddlyTweeter
написал:
>
> Ciao Mat
>
> Like Neo <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQ1_IbFFbzA>, you are
> developing a near total Setup Matrix ...
>
> Then ... I wondered why is there no column for "TWClassic??" ... Some of
> the options DO support TW Classic.
>
> Could that be added? The overhead seems small. The user-info. benefit
> significant.
>
> Just thoughts
> Josiah
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b0281cc6-ae84-412a-98ef-d1488ab9ec50%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
