I was wondering that too. It would have to be a "Saves TWC" column just to
indicate the "Save" functionality, but not necessarily the other
functionality.
-- Mark
On Sunday, June 3, 2018 at 8:54:14 AM UTC-7, Yakov wrote:
>
> Hi Josiah,
>
> I have to note that marking which of those support TWc is ambivalent if
> other tools, that are for TWc only, are not listed, but if it's ok to add
> those than I'd vote for it. Still, this can be confusing: like if
> "encryption" is marked green it won't mean it is supported for TWc without
> a separate plugin; and with a separate plugin, the support may be different
> from that for TW5.
>
> Perhaps TiddlyChrome should be mentioned in the same section as TiddlyFox
> ("Potential candidates").
>
> This is a single-editor project, isn't it? Or some collaborators can be
> added?
>
> Best regards,
> Yakov.
>
> воскресенье, 3 июня 2018 г., 16:09:14 UTC+3 пользователь @TiddlyTweeter
> написал:
>>
>> Ciao Mat
>>
>> Like Neo <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQ1_IbFFbzA>, you are
>> developing a near total Setup Matrix ...
>>
>> Then ... I wondered why is there no column for "TWClassic??" ... Some of
>> the options DO support TW Classic.
>>
>> Could that be added? The overhead seems small. The user-info. benefit
>> significant.
>>
>> Just thoughts
>> Josiah
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0e77c518-b623-479e-9558-c1b48841e670%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
