Ciao Mat This is an Afterthought. It is no way an original thought of mine.
It came from reading up a lot on the various solutions for running TW, plus some on-the-turf experience of frustration when a solution turned out to have limits I was NOT warned about in advance. Solution: It is simply this: Have a descriptive field that says what a solution specifically WON'T DO! Not in the choice system, but visible in the full details of an option. This came up to me as pretty important to actual usage. Especially for new users. Let me give you two examples ... 1 -- Running under Node, accessing external files like images, pdfs, mp3 can get very complicated. It would not be a first choice IF you needed simple routine integration of such files. 2 -- Running in TiddlyDesktop. It has limits in that it is not a full browser. For instance it can't save passwords. It can't in "new window" currently print. (Though a recent plugin by BTC enables it.) For many uses these lacks won't matter. For some they really will. Whilst great filtering criteria--like you have--gets you close to the right choice, a few additional things need commented on before a user commits to a download of an install, IMO. This is not meant as implying YOU should do anything more. Merely I think it (the "It Won't") will turn up, sooner-or-later a salient factor in actual choices. Hope this is clear! Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/aaeda6cd-15dc-4f68-a617-b66374e32bbf%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
