And then someone could just come up with a 'writer's edition' of TiddlyWiki that has the seamless theme, hidden sidebar, hidden four more-edit components, and maybe zoomin mode, so writers can download a copy and jump right in without having to set it up.
On Saturday, September 15, 2018 at 9:07:20 AM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > There was a very interesting comment on Twitter about why the user wasn't > going for TiddlyWiki ... > > ... it's really useful! i was seduced by the utter simplicity of plain >> text files though. i really enjoy stark, stripped down interaces >> (especially for writing) >> > > ... for me it was more textural than anything. that's one of the >> challenges for me in finding a replacement. it seems there are similar >> tools (zim, etc.) but all of them have a similarly busy interface. > > > @lorenschmidt > <https://twitter.com/lorenschmidt/status/1039960312223604736> > > It raises a great point about need for a design for the minimalist > interface possible, optimised for writers who want to write *first*, and > organise later. > > Any thoughts? > Josiah > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5cc3a8c8-fe7d-45d3-bbfc-0a86c29fc791%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
