There was a very interesting comment on Twitter about why the user wasn't going for TiddlyWiki ...
... it's really useful! i was seduced by the utter simplicity of plain text > files though. i really enjoy stark, stripped down interaces (especially for > writing) > ... for me it was more textural than anything. that's one of the challenges > for me in finding a replacement. it seems there are similar tools (zim, > etc.) but all of them have a similarly busy interface. @lorenschmidt <https://twitter.com/lorenschmidt/status/1039960312223604736> It raises a great point about need for a design for the minimalist interface possible, optimised for writers who want to write *first*, and organise later. Any thoughts? Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7d378e63-ff58-46ec-9b2b-1228572406bc%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
