Dear h0p3, Many thanks for your kind words!
I am glad you find it useful. Of course this tool is not comparable with TiddlyTool from Eric Shulman, he is one of Tiddlywiki expert. By the way, I will try to see which part of your comments are possible to be implemented. Searching and replacing contents inside tiddlers need string processing. By my best of knowledge it is not present in the TW core and needs installing additional plugins. But if Jeremy or other developer see this post may give me advises how to tackle such case. Cheers Mohammad On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 3:58:58 AM UTC+3:30, h0p3 wrote: > > * https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/w9Bv-WulKw8 > * https://philosopher.life/#2019.02.12%20-%20TWGGF%3A%20Commander > > This is the perfect tool for someone who uses TW like I do. I have to > massage my wiki. Thank you for making this gorgeous tool. I want to kiss > your feet. I //strongly// agree: the functionality of this tool should be > in the core. It's absurdly useful. It appears to be the second coming of > TiddlerTool. I will joyously be testing it out. > > I have no expectations; I'm grateful to have the chance to use your > software. What I want or would use, of course, may not be valuable to this > project. You've asked for feedback, and I'm going to take the opportunity > to give you my constructive ideas. > > * Enable search input boxes which do not require filter expressions. > ** Filter expression construction increases the cognitive load for the > user. > ** TiddlyTool was outstanding for this because I could search by title, > field, or tag, one at a time, to narrow things down. > *** Searching based on specified content in the body would be useful. > *** Searching by date ranges in title prefixes (e.g. YYYY.MM.DD > <http://YYYY.DD.MM> - YYYY.MM.DD <http://YYYY.DD.MM>) would be useful to > some. > ** Case sensitivity options may be useful. > > * Allow one to manually pick out exceptions. > ** The ability to select by checkbox can be extremely useful. > ** Applying batch operations to checked or unchecked enables a fuzziness > in the initial search. > ** This may have an unworthy performance penalty. > > * Enable the ability to replace specified contents in the bodies of > tiddlers. > > * I would request you optimize for performance. > ** I can tell you that once you start hitting thousands of tiddlers, these > kinds of tools can sometimes become unwieldy and even broken. I have had > them freeze and crash browsers and node many times. > > Your work is dope. Thank you! > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e03aa07c-53bb-45d3-859a-a03016684625%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
