Thanks for posting this Adrian. On the TW side I agree with S.S. - breaking everything down into smaller units might be another possible refinement. For example a straight bibliographic list, in one place, of all the sources that you have finally used and classified would be interesting. It might be easier to produce from sources broken down to individual tiddler units and fields. (But maybe more complicated and time-consuming to manage, cut and paste gets the job done too.) >From a reader point of view I'd be interested to read a brief description of >probabilistic topic modelling and your methodology. Thanks again, it's a very >interesting resource.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7b2df2a7-929d-44cc-bf9e-19e763fa78e7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
