Thanks for the feedback, Watt. On Monday, March 11, 2019 at 6:28:03 AM UTC+8, Watt wrote: > > Thanks for posting this Adrian. On the TW side I agree with S.S. - > breaking everything down into smaller units might be another possible > refinement. For example a straight bibliographic list, in one place, of all > the sources that you have finally used and classified would be interesting. > It might be easier to produce from sources broken down to individual > tiddler units and fields. (But maybe more complicated and time-consuming to > manage, cut and paste gets the job done too.) > From a reader point of view I'd be interested to read a brief description > of probabilistic topic modelling and your methodology. Thanks again, it's a > very interesting resource.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f345b02b-a990-412b-a1d6-b57c9c2ff277%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
