>From the example André gave I think he is saying he would like a plugin 
that grabs the headers (!) (!!) etc, in a tiddler and creates a toc from 
them.

With the recent workaround for section ID's 
(https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/tiddlywiki/anchor%7Csort:date/tiddlywiki/ikjxwjllFtE/wIfyXCCsCQAJ),
 
would this now be possible to create?

Dave

On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 12:30:35 PM UTC-5, Mark S. wrote:
>
> Probably the official way you'd do this is to have a tiddler that lists 
> your tiddlers. That becomes your TOC. Have a button that opens all the 
> tiddlers in your story. Use a templates and styles to hide the divisions 
> between tiddlers. Now it will look like a single page with a TOC, and you 
> can navigate to "sections",  but behind the scenes it's using tiddlers. I'm 
> sure this has been done somewhere already.
>
> You could also look at this post 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/tiddlywiki/ikjxwjllFtE/CYlY6UwrAQAJ 
> that shows a method to allow you to have anchors in tiddlers again. But I 
> think you would have to hand-make the TOC.
>
> Good luck!
>
> On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 8:44:35 AM UTC-7, André Carvalho wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I used a TiddlerToCPlugin 
>> <http://suiryc.github.io/TiddlyWiki-dev/#TiddlerToCPlugin> in Classic 
>> TiddlyWiki that was perfect ( See example at 
>> http://acarvalho.tiddlyspot.com/#%5B%5BWriting%20Good%20Requirements%5D%5D 
>> ). And can not find anything similar for 5. 
>>
>> I'm not a Javascript programmer but I do not see any architectural 
>> obstacle to do an intra-tiddler TOC and it is a feature that is essential 
>> for my way of using TiddlyWiki so I would be thankful to anyone that point 
>> me to some sort of solution. 
>>
>> Please keep the "*tiddler philosophy*" off the discussion, TiddlyWiki is 
>> a tool, an amazing one, and I'll use it as I can and want.
>> I think that we lost a lot (and gained another lot) on the breaking 
>> upgrade from Classic and I do not see TW 5 plugins gaining *momentum* to 
>> get even close to what we had in Classic. That's unfortunate because 
>> TiddlyWiki is such an amazing tool that can be used in so much different 
>> ways. In my humble view part of the problem may be the excessive use of the 
>> "*tiddler philosophy*" answer... if it is architecturally possible, 
>> please, just consider it (or ignore it if you want) and let each user 
>> decide how they want to use our beloved TiddlyWiki.
>>
>> Best regards
>> André
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/39600840-ddfa-4203-8c1b-e970208c2090%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to