With a regular expression extractor (PR #2963) I can imagine a TOC being generated (though the order would probably have to be set by the id #s).
-- Mark On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 10:48:01 AM UTC-7, David Gifford wrote: > > From the example André gave I think he is saying he would like a plugin > that grabs the headers (!) (!!) etc, in a tiddler and creates a toc from > them. > > With the recent workaround for section ID's ( > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/tiddlywiki/anchor%7Csort:date/tiddlywiki/ikjxwjllFtE/wIfyXCCsCQAJ), > > would this now be possible to create? > > Dave > > On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 12:30:35 PM UTC-5, Mark S. wrote: >> >> Probably the official way you'd do this is to have a tiddler that lists >> your tiddlers. That becomes your TOC. Have a button that opens all the >> tiddlers in your story. Use a templates and styles to hide the divisions >> between tiddlers. Now it will look like a single page with a TOC, and you >> can navigate to "sections", but behind the scenes it's using tiddlers. I'm >> sure this has been done somewhere already. >> >> You could also look at this post >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/tiddlywiki/ikjxwjllFtE/CYlY6UwrAQAJ >> that shows a method to allow you to have anchors in tiddlers again. But I >> think you would have to hand-make the TOC. >> >> Good luck! >> >> On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 8:44:35 AM UTC-7, André Carvalho wrote: >>> >>> Hi all >>> >>> I used a TiddlerToCPlugin >>> <http://suiryc.github.io/TiddlyWiki-dev/#TiddlerToCPlugin> in Classic >>> TiddlyWiki that was perfect ( See example at >>> http://acarvalho.tiddlyspot.com/#%5B%5BWriting%20Good%20Requirements%5D%5D >>> ). And can not find anything similar for 5. >>> >>> I'm not a Javascript programmer but I do not see any architectural >>> obstacle to do an intra-tiddler TOC and it is a feature that is essential >>> for my way of using TiddlyWiki so I would be thankful to anyone that point >>> me to some sort of solution. >>> >>> Please keep the "*tiddler philosophy*" off the discussion, TiddlyWiki >>> is a tool, an amazing one, and I'll use it as I can and want. >>> I think that we lost a lot (and gained another lot) on the breaking >>> upgrade from Classic and I do not see TW 5 plugins gaining *momentum* >>> to get even close to what we had in Classic. That's unfortunate because >>> TiddlyWiki is such an amazing tool that can be used in so much different >>> ways. In my humble view part of the problem may be the excessive use of the >>> "*tiddler philosophy*" answer... if it is architecturally possible, >>> please, just consider it (or ignore it if you want) and let each user >>> decide how they want to use our beloved TiddlyWiki. >>> >>> Best regards >>> André >>> >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3fd2f265-a047-4d5b-86f2-a65c6f5e9369%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
