What are the physical characteristics of the machine that ran your tests? RAM? Ghz? Make? Type of HD?
Thanks! On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 3:50:24 AM UTC-7, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > Several of the projects I’m working on for Federatial clients involve > large wikis, in the 10MB to 100MB range. I’ve posted before about the > surprisingly good performance of such large wikis, and recently worked on > improving performance further through the introduction of more > sophisticated indexing strategies. > > As an experiment, today I just tried combining the data from several large > wikis to make a compound wiki that weighs in at 874.9MB (nearly a > gigabyte!). To my astonishment, Chrome and Firefox will both run it with > reasonable performance (Safari complains about resource usage). > > The wiki actually only contains 60 tiddlers, of which 13 are plugins > containing a total of 64,202 shadow tiddlers (this project uses plugins to > package wiki content). There are just over 3,000 images, weighing in at > about 197MB of base64 encoded text. > > I don’t think such large wikis are practical for everyday use right now, > but they certainly will be in the next few years. (None of this is actually > to praise TiddlyWiki; it’s the hardworking browser engineers over the last > decade that we have to thank). > > Best wishes > > Jeremy. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2b9b25b7-67d8-4b1d-877e-d94e73c856d1%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
