What platform? What operating system? How much memory? How many Ghz? I find I have to reboot FF periodically. In the process manager, I can see it slowly take over more and more memory. It's done this in every version, including the latest, greatest, "improved" version.
On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 11:21:16 AM UTC-7, Diego Mesa wrote: > > Hey Jeremy, > > Ive recently noticed my wiki (10MB) has been very slow, much more so on FF > than on chrome. Im very interested in your results, and how I would go > about debugging my wiki. > > On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 11:13:50 AM UTC-4, Jeremy Ruston wrote: >> >> Hi Mark >> >> What are the physical characteristics of the machine that ran your tests? >> RAM? Ghz? Make? Type of HD? >> >> >> I’ve recently got a modern Mac with 16GB RAM, 512MB SSD and a 3 GHz Intel >> Core i5. But I went back to my old 2013 MacBook Pro (also 16GB RAM and >> 512MB SSD) and tried the file there. It only runs 10-20% slower than on the >> big computer. >> >> I suspect that having 16GB RAM has the biggest impact on performance. >> >> Best wishes >> >> Jeremy >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 3:50:24 AM UTC-7, Jeremy Ruston wrote: >>> >>> Several of the projects I’m working on for Federatial clients involve >>> large wikis, in the 10MB to 100MB range. I’ve posted before about the >>> surprisingly good performance of such large wikis, and recently worked on >>> improving performance further through the introduction of more >>> sophisticated indexing strategies. >>> >>> As an experiment, today I just tried combining the data from several >>> large wikis to make a compound wiki that weighs in at 874.9MB (nearly a >>> gigabyte!). To my astonishment, Chrome and Firefox will both run it with >>> reasonable performance (Safari complains about resource usage). >>> >>> The wiki actually only contains 60 tiddlers, of which 13 are plugins >>> containing a total of 64,202 shadow tiddlers (this project uses plugins to >>> package wiki content). There are just over 3,000 images, weighing in at >>> about 197MB of base64 encoded text. >>> >>> I don’t think such large wikis are practical for everyday use right now, >>> but they certainly will be in the next few years. (None of this is actually >>> to praise TiddlyWiki; it’s the hardworking browser engineers over the last >>> decade that we have to thank). >>> >>> Best wishes >>> >>> Jeremy. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "TiddlyWiki" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2b9b25b7-67d8-4b1d-877e-d94e73c856d1%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2b9b25b7-67d8-4b1d-877e-d94e73c856d1%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b8d339bc-9457-48c4-99dc-a0fb2132ee8d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
