The backup choice certainly makes sense for me. My working files are on a network drive, which may occasionally flake out. The most dangerous moment is when copying from the download directory which is on a reliable (knock on silicon) hard drive to the home on the network drive. So making a copy before that to the (hopefully) solid hard drive first makes the most sense. That way even if something bad happens in transit, there's one or more backups.
Whom or what are these dock Men of which you speak? On Wednesday, July 24, 2019 at 9:01:30 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao Mark S. > > *Comment from test on BACKUPS ...* > > - Your choice to make Backups and Zips be of the "previous" version > (i.e. prior to RESTORE) of the wiki is, I think, a very good one. > > > - It matches well what backups are for. And better ensures viability. > > > - But I I think its worth our mentioning the behaviour in > documentation. > > TT > >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/00d90418-5e99-4f42-b876-0f1c3bad4d17%40googlegroups.com.
