At the time I made it I was mostly worried about creating unique file names that wouldn't clobber each other.
At some point, if we can figure how to do it, it would make more sense to stamp them with the original date stamp, since that's what you're going to be looking for if you have to do a restore-from-backup. On Friday, July 26, 2019 at 2:32:18 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao Mark S. & interested avians, > > I made a second test sequence that focuses more tightly on CHECKING that > Polly basics work ... I will upload it soon. > > Overall everything is looking VERY good. > > BUT, there IS an **informational issue** on Backups & Zip Archives. To do > with the name/time stamp format. > > This is the easiest way I can put it ... > > Q: SHOULD they be stamped with the moment of CREATION of the backup or >> Archive? > > Or should they be stamped with a cloned time of the LASTWRITETIME of the >> Wiki Backed-up or Zip Archived? > > > Thoughts! > > On the one hand it makes sense to mark backups with timestamps of exactly > when they were created. > > On the other hand it ALSO makes sense to replicate the exact time of the > Wiki that is backed-up. > > I'm trying to think this through. > > Your thoughts? > > TT > >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/766aa97b-8e52-4224-b1f0-9fd22b2224a8%40googlegroups.com.
