TonyM wrote: > > > I would not underestimate the value of a plain English operator like match > for easy to read tests especially when they control visibility and > structure in code. >
Don't disagree. But its not a straw man. Its the intelligent man--when you need her. Your example triumphed plain English *ignoring regex does plain already*. > On regex you could give the community A great resource if you provide 10 > to 20 top regex tests we may want to use. I could brainstorm some desirable > ones. > I'd happily do it. But I need to know what is needed. What is relevant? TT > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/90d86cde-7e88-4acf-85bc-3fbc0cf9513d%40googlegroups.com.
