Thank you for the valuable info, Jeremy, and Tony -- for the suggestion. As a user, there's nothing to worry about thanks to our commitment to > backwards compatibility >
This is exactly what I wanted to hear :) Thanks again, I really appreciate the hard work you put into TiddlyWiki and I'm excited to see it evolve. Best regards, Hubert On Monday, 19 August 2019 12:17:13 UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > To emphasise that the discussion about deprecating data tiddlers is part > of the long term conversation about the evolution of the core of > TiddlyWiki. As a user, there's nothing to worry about thanks to our > commitment to backwards compatibility. > > And to clarify further: "deprecated" in this context doesn't mean that > something goes away, just that we recommend against using it for new work. > > Best wishes > > Jeremy > > -- > Jeremy Ruston > [email protected] <javascript:> > https://jermolene.com > > On 19 Aug 2019, at 12:31, Jeremy Ruston <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > Hi Tony > > “Data tiddlers” refers both to tiddlers formatted as JSON and those > formatted as a dictionary tiddler. > > Best wishes > > Jeremy > > -- > Jeremy Ruston > > > On 19 Aug 2019, at 12:26, TonyM <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > Jeremy, Hubert, > > I assumed data tiddlers tends to refer to DictionaryTiddlers > <https://tiddlywiki.com/#DictionaryTiddlers> rather than JSONTiddlers > <https://tiddlywiki.com/#JSONTiddlers> > Perhaps JSON tiddlers is the way to go. > > And you can extend JSON handling using Joshuas JSON Tools for Tiddlywiki > 5.1.20! > <https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!searchin/tiddlywikidev/json$20editor%7Csort:date/tiddlywikidev/UmxVCRtdt0I/h0PORNMTAQAJ>if > > you want to get really serious. > > Regards > Tony > > On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 7:15:35 PM UTC+10, Hubert wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> With data tiddlers being deprecated, would anyone suggest a best practice >> approach to storing large data sets in the flat format key:value? I know >> that Jeremy suggested plugins but I could not find anything remotely >> related. >> >> Among other things, I'm using TW to log my cardio workouts. I now have >> thousands of dictionary entries relating to cardio workouts as well as >> their types and durations that I dynamically retrieve to generate stats, >> summaries, forecasts and SVG charts. And so I was wondering if there's now >> a better option to have the underlying data stored within TiddlyWiki other >> than in a single data tiddler. I would obviously wish to avoid a scenario >> where each data point is a single tiddler. I would also like to avoid >> plugins because there's no warranty they will be maintained forever. >> However, if there's a "clean" solution (perhaps with the use of system >> tiddlers) or anything else generally considered "better" than data >> tiddlers, while still being as future proof as possible, then I'm open to >> suggestions. >> >> Thank you (and apologies for the wall of text). >> >> Regards, >> Hubert >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/38d413bb-2f93-4803-af11-0373df29eecd%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/38d413bb-2f93-4803-af11-0373df29eecd%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2e6f8a9f-a70b-4a45-be24-c55deef591de%40googlegroups.com.
