Tony, A p-element is *already* styled display:block automatically. Constructing a style attribute or a class with display:block to be applied to a p-element is redundant (i.e. it does nothing).
Using your reference site, check for P here: https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css_default_values.asp On Friday, September 27, 2019 at 7:00:37 PM UTC-5, TonyM wrote: > > CdK > > Yes that is happening and this is what we would expect. If rather than use > period, I do this myself we get the expected result. > > <p>test</p> > test > test > <p>test</p> > > I assume your fix is only adding the paragraph tags? > > If I use the developer tools inspect I see this in the erroneous results > <p> > <p>test</p> > </p> > <p>test test .test</p> > > I think what is happening is a result of the Wiki text and html see here > https://tiddlywiki.com/#HTML%20in%20WikiText > > Block mode versus Inline mode > > To get the content of an HTML element to be parsed in block mode, the > opening tag must be followed by two linebreaks. > > Without the two linebreaks, the tag content will be parsed in inline mode > which means that block mode formatting such as wikitext tables, lists and > headings is not recognised. > > If you alter our test case as follows it behaves as expected. > .test > test > test > > .test > > Perhaps we need to force block mode > > This demonstrates what I mean > .test > test > test > .test > <hr> > <p style="display: block">test</p> > test > test > <p style="display: block">test</p> > > So in support of this and as an extension I suggested earlier we could use > a class > > <style> > .parra {display: block} > </style> > > <p class="parra">test</p> > test > test > <p class="parra">test</p> > Of course the style would be in a stylesheet. > > And the designer could change the way our "period" paragraphs are styled. > > Additional reference https://www.w3schools.com/css/css_inline-block.asp > > Regards > Tony > > On Friday, September 27, 2019 at 9:52:46 PM UTC+10, Cd.K wrote: >> >> TonyM >> >> I discovered the following error in the period rule: >> >> .test >> test >> test >> .test >> >> >> renders as >> >> test >> >> test test .test >> >> >> expected: >> >> test >> >> >> test test >> >> >> test >> >> Do you agree? >> >> Regards >> Cd.K >> >> >> >> >> On Friday, September 27, 2019 at 8:40:16 AM UTC+2, TonyM wrote: >>> >>> CdK, >>> >>> I love the operation of the leading period on a 5.1.20 >>> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7acd06b2-bd42-44d7-9344-35d6a4499c61%40googlegroups.com.
