> Discourse costs money, - it is free for open source - it is open source and can be hosted anywhere. In this case the hosting wouldn't be free of cause.
> GitHub doesn't Github is not a forum. It a very limited issue tracker. Even as an issue tracker it is very hard to use for big teams and complex projects. - it doesn't support nested issues - it doesn't support splitting the issue into two - there is only one issue template - checklists not always work (you need to edit the comment manually) - no support for custom anchors to create links to a portion of content (there is a hack which relies on markdown corner case) - the 'project' feature drops new tickets at the top. So ordering of tickets is a waste of time. - the 'project card' is not an 'issue' by default - no support for deadline for issues - no support for priorities - search doesn't support multiple conditions I think it would be hard to use it as a community knowledge base. It doesn't mean we shouldn't try, though. I think we shouldn't mix different use cases. We have multiple: - 1. as a user I want to be able to search old questions - 2. as a community contributor I want to be able to collaborate on ecosystem enhancements projects - 3. as a developer I want to be able to share designs and code with all decision makers - 4. as a content developer I should be able easily contribute to tiddlywiki.com website - 5. as a designer I should be able to easily demo my solutions and register them on a common catalog - 6. as a translator it should be easy for me to contribute to non English content on tiddlywiki.com and tiddlywiki codebase - 7. As a content curator I should be able to vote and promote good questions to a status of an article I feel like we (people on this thread) have different goals in mind. So it would help a lot if we would agree on what we want to achieve. I do believe that there is no software which would cover all our use cases I mentioned above. Discourse is good for #1, github is good for #3, new solution based on tiddlywiki itself might be a good fit for project management portion of #2. Best regards, iilyak On 5 October 2019 20:22:46 GMT-07:00, "Cd.K" <[email protected]> wrote: >Discourse costs money, GitHub doesn't. > >Unlike GitHub, Google Groups doesn't develop any further. > >Many communities have made the jump from GG. > >GG was top at its time but not anymore today. > > > > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >an email to [email protected]. >To view this discussion on the web visit >https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9284ca1c-6329-4de8-8e90-01d3f6d78378%40googlegroups.com. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/07461B25-91FC-4F5E-B31A-AC211E2021E7%40gmail.com.
