On Feb 12, 1:57 am, Måns <[email protected]> wrote: > .... At the very beginning there were some posts in the > > group. But since several month. Nothing ... Either, the users don't > > use these plugins anymore, or they got them fixed. There was no need > > to stop the core. > > I don't agree :-) Thx Måns, I hoped I can tickle you.
> IMHO: > > I was one of those users, who tried to make some of the most vital (to me at > least...) plugins/transclusions work on TS. > I managed to fix a few (two or three in all... "TiddlerNotesPlugin", > "QuickNotes","CreateTiddlersFromCSV" and maybe one more - don't remember..) > The reason why I haven't kept on reporting incompabilities on the TiddlyWeb > group - is the fact that most of these discussions now take place on the > TiddlyWiki usergroup instead. I did follow some of the treads, and they seemed to solve there problems. > My hope or vision if you like - (initially) was that most of Eric's > (tiddlytools) great plugins (especially import/export UI's and features) > would be acknowleged as a standard which users of TiddlyWiki have come to > expect from TiddlyWiki, and therefore investigated and copied into > TiddlySpace by TS core developers... I don't think, TS devs are responsible for this. Eric's site state: "There are 447 tiddlers, including:115 plugins+76 transclusions(2038607 total bytes)" And I haven't seen indications, that Eric want's to _move_ to TS. There was a post from Eric, that most, or all transclusions (76) need rewriting, because of the "evaluated parameter" security issue. That's a hell lot of work. And .. As I understand tiddlytools "Terms of use" first paragraph [1], imo it clearly explains, not to do so. > New social channels ... > From my adventures in TS-land I've discovered that there's a genuine wish to > create new "social channels" around the "TiddlyWikiProject" and I hope that > Eric (or his Legacy) won't get lost in the process. I really wish that Eric > would get into the TS-game. @Eric, Can you tell us your opinion? snip > Rating as a pointer: > I wish we had a ratingsystem where everybody could vote for plugins to be > tested against a beta-release, - then core-developers and/or > plugin-developers would know what to test and eventually fix anticipating a > release meant for upgrade.. Activating the Community would be great. But I am a little bit pessimistic about this. [2]. But I deffinitly think it's worth it :) > I believe that Eric's standards for plugindocumentation and TiddlyTools > itself could be simulated by TS in some form - I don't see why not... Vote +1 -m [1] http://www.tiddlytools.com/#LegalStatements [2] http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki/msg/569d7f8cd66b71f1?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
