> I'm not particularly advocating Jinga2. If someone thinks there is a > more widely used or more suitable template language, then I am fine > with that. One advantage of Jinga2 is that it is used by TiddlyWeb. > > What I am advocating is that TiddlyWiki5 uses an existing standard, > rather than create its own.
My vote would go with Mustache (http://mustache.github.com/) which has the benefit of cleaner syntax, and more portable templates (it supports 21 languages). > I agree this is a minor point. But every time TiddlyWiki creates its > own standard, rather than uses an existing one, it makes it slightly > less usable/adoptable. And it means TiddlyWiki potentially looses out > from some unexpected benefits that result from the use of a > pre-existing standard. I fully agree. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
