+1 It might be worth considering something Markdown-inspired. The various flavours of MD have a lot of momentum (GitHub, StackOverflow, Google+, Jekyll/Octopress, many Dropbox editors) and familiarity is a worthy goal. It can't be the same as Markdown, but it could be one-way compatible with it (MD->TW).
I agree. I've already taken the `backtick monospace` syntax, and there's been some discussion of adopting more. Another thing I like is the way that it allows for arbitrary white listed HTML tags, which I also intend to steal, allowing TiddlyWiki to drop the distinction between wiki text and HTML templates. More to the point, I'd like TW5 to directly support tiddlers written in MarkDown via an optional plugin, with support for links and macros. Best wishes Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
