> My vote would go with Mustache (http://mustache.github.com/) which has > the benefit of cleaner syntax, and more portable templates (it > supports 21 languages). > > > I agree this is a minor point. But every time TiddlyWiki creates its > > own standard, rather than uses an existing one, it makes it slightly > > less usable/adoptable. And it means TiddlyWiki potentially looses out > > from some unexpected benefits that result from the use of a > > pre-existing standard. > > I fully agree. >
+1 It might be worth considering something Markdown-inspired. The various flavours of MD have a lot of momentum (GitHub, StackOverflow, Google+, Jekyll/Octopress, many Dropbox editors) and familiarity is a worthy goal. It can't be the same as Markdown, but it could be one-way compatible with it (MD->TW). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
