Further to the recent discussion about content types for wikitext, I subsequently found this page:
http://foswiki.org/Development/MIMETypeForWikiSyntax Based on all of that, "text/vnd.tiddlywiki" seems like the most promising option. I've been thinking about the problem of distinguishing tw5 and tw2 wikitext and am interested in the idea of using a content type parameter to indicate the vocabulary that should be used to interpret wikitext. For example // Specifies standard tw5 wikitext text/vnd.tiddlywiki; vocabulary=(tw5) // Specifies classic tw2 wikitext text/vnd.tiddlywiki; vocabulary=(tw2) // Specifies a custom vocabulary text/vnd.tiddlywiki; vocabulary=http://mywiki.tiddlyspace.com/EngineeringVocabulary.txt The idea is that a vocabulary would specify the wikitext rules and macros to be applied when interpreting a particular block of text. The content type parameter gives the URL of a tiddler that lists the elements of the vocabulary, with escape sequences like "(tw5)" as shortcuts for specifying standard URLs for the main system vocabularies. Is this a reasonable use of content type parameters? Is TiddlyWeb set up to deal with parameterised content types? Best wishes Jeremy -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
