On 18 Jul., 19:12, [email protected] wrote: > This is probably fine, but we have extant code and tiddlers that use > > text/x.tiddlywiki > > to mean tiddlywiki2 so symmetry would get broken, but I suppose that's > not a big deal. As of the last thread about the mime types, I thought, I'm the only one, that ever marked a tiddler type:text/x-tiddlywiki. Just for testing the tiddly wiki text - syntax highlighting stuff.
I did mark many tiddlers with a custom field['content-type'] for my internal use. I'll need to change them, after a decision is made and the tiddlywiki mime is registered. I'd have no problem, to use application/vnd.tiddlywiki: a TiddlyWiki 5+ document (e.g empty.html) text/vnd.tiddlywiki: a tiddler of tiddlywiki 5 <- I think there was a typo in Jeremy's post - right? and mark TW2 stuff as special. Especially, I hope that TW5 will have enough compatibility to deal with TW2 _default_ syntax. Special macros have to be rewritten anyway. > > Parenthetically, the TW5 code puts all the user fields of a tiddler in > > the tiddler.fields hashmap, which has turned out to be much more > > convenient. The old way allowed one to write 'tiddler.title' instead > > of 'tiddler.fields.title', but it made almost everything else more > > complicated. > > "User fields"? I allways felt, that the fields handling made everything complicated :) May be because I started to mess with them, at a later point in time. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
