> Other than my previously expressed dislike for "vnd", I very much agree > with cdent that what you have here are two different content types.
The proposal under discussion here uses the parameterisation mechanism not just to distinguish between tw2 and tw5 wikitext, but between the local wikitext dialects that people evolve with the revised macro mechanism that is under consideration. > The fact that there's common history and just because a client can > render both classic and new TiddlyWiki markup doesn't mean they should > be conflated - both from technical perspective and WRT user perception. Neither of those things are the motivation for suggesting a common content type across dialects for wiki text tiddlers Best wishes Jeremy > > -- F. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWikiDev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en. > -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
