El lunes, 1 de diciembre de 2014 13:49:56 UTC+1, Tobias Beer escribió: > > Hi Danielo, > > The way I would envision this is rather to have the cloud storage for > "content tiddlers"... as the main host and then have some form of core / > skelleton / app TiddlyWiki (like Taskgraph) into which you load those > tiddlers via some ServerSync Plugin. > I don't understand this part, could you please elaborate what do you mean with "content tiddlers" ?
> > To go one step further, I'd rather see something like different "bags"... > thus a number of storages from which you can pull content, which are even > loaded in the background and neatly separated so as to have no > name-clashes, although the displayed name would be that of the tiddler, and > not some "source:// tiddler" construct. > Does the folders fits this? Maybe we can save to which folder a tiddler is saved via some custom field like gas_folder. Anyway, the file ID identifies that particular tiddler unequivocally > > Then there'd be an indicator that for tiddler "Foo", there are, in fact, > two different versions, one from source X and another from source Y. And > the one from source Y even has updates that aren't yet loaded into your > TiddlyWiki instance, so you can update it on-demand, compare, merge and > sync back to that very store / source / bag. > Unless the merge and compare thing this is also possible. Let me know if you think something different. > > However, having that "TiddlyWiki" be the master seems counter-intuitive to > the whole idea of having a dedicated content-store. As for me, that's the > whole purpose of it. You have your content tid-by-tid up in the cloud > accessible from whichever device and your individual TiddlyWiki's — > whichever way they operate or look like — have one thing in common: a > plugin that safely syncs changes to-and-from the server... while staying a > functional TiddlyWiki "content-free" ...which can, however, optionally, be > saved as a standalone backup of all content. > > I don't understand the first sentence. There is no "master" tiddlywiki. I just want to provide the ability to sync your wiki to a server without loosing the option to save that content on your own wiki. That is something that drives me crazy about syncadaptors and every other implementation of tiddlywiki. You have to choose between being 100% online or be 100% offline, there is nothing halfway. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
