El sábado, 31 de enero de 2015, 15:19:06 (UTC+1), Tobias Beer escribió:
>
> I entirely like the idea of tagspaces replicated via TiddlyWiki and I am 
> thinking TiddlyWiki5 is quite ready for it.
>

Me too, that's why I want to do this. But my approach will be quite 
different. First of all, ti will be focused mainly on source code and 
plaint text files. What I want to provide is a way to search inside the 
text of those files, and, of course, display them within TW.
 

>
> I'm wondering, though, (why) do you actually need any *meta* files?
> Won't plain tiddlers do, pointing to a file in some folder on that file 
> system?
>

I'm not sure what a tiddler "pointing" to a file means to you. Could you 
elaborate this? Is a tiddler that has a field that points to the file 
location? Is a tiddler that embeds that file? What do you mean exactly?
The meta files are needed for allow the user to add tags and fields to the 
tiddler without writing that information to the original file. I think I 
will not use meta files but something similar to tiddlywiki.files is.


 

>
> That's quite different approach,
> you're not actually pulling these files into the wiki,
> you're merely referencing them.
>

Yes, I'm pulling those files into the wiki. That's the idea. That is the 
only way to provide text search, which is my main goal. I used to include 
lots of code snippets in my wiki, and sometimes I would love to be able to 
search within my "full" source code folders in the same way. Maybe a too 
narrow scenario?
 

>
> So, what you may want is some module that avails a folder tree to a 
> TiddlyWiki (via json)
> so you can create tiddlers relating to any of those files in the JSON 
> index,
> by means of a simple macro to extract those data from that json index.
>
> The only syncing you would do is for plain tiddlers... nothing extra.
>

I think i'm starting to get your point, Your idea is to create the index, 
maybe on startup or whatever, and then, on the tiddlers, just embed those 
files. Isn't it? So the only thing available for searching is the title, 
and maybe the extra information you add to the tiddler that links to the 
original file. It is definitively a different approach, and in some way I 
like it very much.
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to