On Friday, May 22, 2015 at 1:17:32 PM UTC+2, Ton Gerner wrote:
>
> In v0.9.2 the height of the timeline graph is automatically adjusted to 
> the data to be shown in the given time slot. The height expands 
> automatically when more date must be shown (as in emkay's original plugin).
> In v0.9.4 the height is fixed (300 px in a separate tiddler; in the 
> sidebar dependent on the 'height' available) so you have to scroll up/down 
> to see all data in the given time slot. Since there is no indication that 
> there is more data in the given time slot it is easy to miss that data. See 
> the difference in attached images.
>

Exactly what I intended.


> Is it possible:
> * to make the height configurable? With choice of automatic or a given 
> height. At the moment it is hard coded in timelinewidget.js.
>

Fair enough to give it as an option. I will look at the feasibility.

However, can you comment the following:
- I can understand someone could want a tiddler to be as long as needed, 
but do you really want to scroll down the sidebar?
- automatic size means the size will change when you move around and zoom, 
which will incur 2 things I did not like on emkay's implementation:
  - the items you were looking at before moving sideways, move up/down on 
their own as more/less items get in the time range, sometimes they get out 
of view even. It is sometimes a hassle to find where they went, much so 
when you cannot scroll easily without risking to actually change the zoom 
and thus make the items move more (I must be clumsy). At least, with a 
fixed boxing, your item stays put, even if it is shown on the bottom of the 
timeline (which can move a lot otherwise).
  - the same timeline can be only a few dozen pixels long, then several 
pages long, in just a few scrolls. wow. If you place your mouse 
inadvertently on the timeline while scrolling down to see what is below, 
you might actually change the zoom again... (I'm still clumsy)
 

> * to give an indication when there is more data than shown? I am not a fan 
> of a (vertical) scroll bar but at least that gives the indication needed.
>

Actually, there is a slight shadow on the top (or bottom, if you move 
upwards) if you have items that are not shown. But that might not be 
enough. I propose to display this information more clearly with the nav 
buttons, or maybe on the background.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/50b22279-8e97-4c65-a70f-180eeb37194e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to