PMario wrote: > > > New test-version will be uploaded today (hopefully). .. It can do crazy > stuff. ... but it also can create RSODs if parameters are missing or wrong > :/ ... so some more testing is needed. eg: > > \ticktext tick="d" tag="details" params=".notop.c.cl" endString="---" > mode=block > \ticktext tick="s" tag="summary" params=".-m" > > ´.d ´.s Details - Summay > line 1 > line 2 > adsf > --- > > Will give this html code: > > <details class="notop c cl wltc-l1"> > <summary class=" -m wltc-l1 wltc">Details - Summay</summary> > <p>line 1<br>line 2<br>adsf </p> > </details> >
Very impressive. Very useful proof. Though to make these may need the user to be more than a newbie I can already see that they could be used in a framework (global macros?/importable "pragma"?) where the user only needs to enter minimal "WikiText-like" code to achieve the effect. If that is so, ultimately, Mat & Tony's concern about user type #1 v type #2 should be minimal. Enormously useful. Especially where you need to write documents that contain HTML that currently has to be manually entered. Supports good structure. An example would be things written following academic style manuals for preparing texts where HTML like abbr, article, section, details etc are optimal. Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/33b57e3b-d3a4-46ee-afcc-90c389b7de15o%40googlegroups.com.
