Post script,

Prior work playing with the power of class names, that tick and angle 
enable on any line, not yet starting with a wikitext symbol and most 
wikitext symbols, was revolutionary on its own. 

By the way please call it htmltag and not tag, there are too many 
unqualified things that use the word tag around already.

The fact is these development almost over shadow the use of classnames on 
any line, and now use of any htmltag.

I thought an included set of css short class names should be put forward as 
a de facto standard so unless people need to vary from that standard it is 
easy to use and reuse on adoption of the tick solution. Or could I say the 
escape wikitext solution. So I hope we can put together an optional 
stylesheet to include with the solution. A little pre-configuration of 
highly extensible solutions are wise so as to help with adoption, provide a 
base on which to build and send most people in a simular direction rather 
than it be an unnecessary but optional "free for all.".

Perhaps a new thread here to discuss the development of this defacto short 
classname definitions that we can include in a stylesheet for use with 
current wikitext character and the new solution.

If nothing else give us a standard around which to demonstrate the use of 
the new solution.

Regards
Tony



On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:21:26 UTC+10, TonyM wrote:
>
>
> Mario
>
> I see now you have abstracted this even further such that our original 
> usecase is but a small subset of the possible. 
>
> Is it posible for the user to select the character?
>
> I particulary love the details example because optional display of content 
> has being way too fidly.
>
> In the naming game i would think somehow this is a wikitext way to escape 
> from the the limitations of wikitext. In fact it allows us to define that 
> escape character and what follows multiple times. So i would be happy with
> \esc ...
> \excape ...
> \excape-wikitext ...
> or all three
>
> Thus escblock if needed.
>
> Then rather than tick= it could be esc= which is what is used to excape 
> from wikitext and apply the htmltag and classnames.
>
>
>    - I have some questions for clarity. I will compose these my tomorrow.
>    - Shall I / we start to write some end user doco?
>
> I continue to be amazed at this development, infinite extencibility in 
> another direction.
>
> Regards
> Tony
>
> On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 at 21:10:18 UTC+10 Mat wrote:
>
>> PMario wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, help requested
>>>
>>
>> LOL! I didn't see your post before posting mine!
>>
>>  
>>
>>> I'm searching for a new name for \tickblock and \tickinline
>>>
>>
>> So as noted \customblock or \indicatorblock, possibly \iblock
>>
>> Q: Will it ever only concern styling? If yes, then possibly \stylesection 
>> or even just \style (... "apply a style pragma")
>>
>> I'm not happy with 
>>>
>>> \tickblock tick=<symbol>  and \tickblock angel=<symbol>
>>>
>>
>> So, yeah, IMO indicator is the right name and one that turned up 
>> naturally in our discussions.
>>  
>> <:-)
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/ee7bbe6f-a9f4-40eb-b948-b2ba43114b5eo%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to