Post Post script, Given this unlimited suite of rapidly typing in wiki test and custom variations that result in bespoke formats and layouts, the fact is this is converted to html to be rendered, and it can be copied as html for use elsewhere (including tiddlywiki)
Then perhaps we have enhanced and built a meta html language for writing html body code? although without the ability to insert javascript functions. I wonder if another pragma would allow code to be included that is ignored in tiddlywiki, but capable of action in the resulting html once placed in a file? Tiddlywiki could become a html page or site SDK with automation and self documentation capabilities that can be previewed in iframes. Build your own "Square space". Just dreaming because that is what you all, and tiddlywiki do to me. Regards Tony On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:38:11 UTC+10, TonyM wrote: > > Post script, > > Prior work playing with the power of class names, that tick and angle > enable on any line, not yet starting with a wikitext symbol and most > wikitext symbols, was revolutionary on its own. > > By the way please call it htmltag and not tag, there are too many > unqualified things that use the word tag around already. > > The fact is these development almost over shadow the use of classnames on > any line, and now use of any htmltag. > > I thought an included set of css short class names should be put forward > as a de facto standard so unless people need to vary from that standard it > is easy to use and reuse on adoption of the tick solution. Or could I say > the escape wikitext solution. So I hope we can put together an optional > stylesheet to include with the solution. A little pre-configuration of > highly extensible solutions are wise so as to help with adoption, provide a > base on which to build and send most people in a simular direction rather > than it be an unnecessary but optional "free for all.". > > Perhaps a new thread here to discuss the development of this defacto short > classname definitions that we can include in a stylesheet for use with > current wikitext character and the new solution. > > If nothing else give us a standard around which to demonstrate the use of > the new solution. > > Regards > Tony > > > > On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 23:21:26 UTC+10, TonyM wrote: >> >> >> Mario >> >> I see now you have abstracted this even further such that our original >> usecase is but a small subset of the possible. >> >> Is it posible for the user to select the character? >> >> I particulary love the details example because optional display of >> content has being way too fidly. >> >> In the naming game i would think somehow this is a wikitext way to escape >> from the the limitations of wikitext. In fact it allows us to define that >> escape character and what follows multiple times. So i would be happy with >> \esc ... >> \excape ... >> \excape-wikitext ... >> or all three >> >> Thus escblock if needed. >> >> Then rather than tick= it could be esc= which is what is used to excape >> from wikitext and apply the htmltag and classnames. >> >> >> - I have some questions for clarity. I will compose these my tomorrow. >> - Shall I / we start to write some end user doco? >> >> I continue to be amazed at this development, infinite extencibility in >> another direction. >> >> Regards >> Tony >> >> On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 at 21:10:18 UTC+10 Mat wrote: >> >>> PMario wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, help requested >>>> >>> >>> LOL! I didn't see your post before posting mine! >>> >>> >>> >>>> I'm searching for a new name for \tickblock and \tickinline >>>> >>> >>> So as noted \customblock or \indicatorblock, possibly \iblock >>> >>> Q: Will it ever only concern styling? If yes, then possibly >>> \stylesection or even just \style (... "apply a style pragma") >>> >>> I'm not happy with >>>> >>>> \tickblock tick=<symbol> and \tickblock angel=<symbol> >>>> >>> >>> So, yeah, IMO indicator is the right name and one that turned up >>> naturally in our discussions. >>> >>> <:-) >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/7747d56c-9709-4644-8b59-e935278b476co%40googlegroups.com.
