On Friday, September 25, 2020 at 12:42:07 PM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: There are two issues in our context ... > > 1 - does the end user need to see what the author used? My guess is that > they *don't.* > I mean we are doing this to make WRITING easier. But most READERS won't be > writers so will never need to see the markup glyphs. >
You are right, but 1 of my main goals for this project is to have the prose text as readable as possible. > 2 - font support is a very complex issue. It is extremely difficult to > determine what glyphs are available visually universally (because of > sophisticated OS substitutions). HOWEVER, I made the point that in many > cases it is ONLY the author who needs to have them supported by a font. > Yea, it would be nice to have a 2 configuration tiddlers, that can initialize the IDs at wiki startup. ... I don't want to read these tiddlers with every occurrence of the \customize pragma. This can considerably slow down this parser. But it would allow users to create their own IDs. THE downside of this approach is: It may create a new Tower of Babel. -mario. PS let's use: Custom markup (continued 3) <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywikidev/JKp9Zp4hvGE> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/d7a101ad-a31a-44c2-9736-f7c2ce07ac88o%40googlegroups.com.
