To clarify my last point about TWO configs, nasty & irritating as the idea is :-(...
I think it very LIKELY that PMario's Custom Markup system will be, eventually, widely used by AUTEURS (originating author geeks). I am NOT convinced that a TW that uses that brilliant system should expose it to every user. I think it would be a support issue of scale to do so. Ongoing thoughts. Just thoughts. Best wishes TT On Friday, 25 September 2020 10:59:08 UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > This for PMario & TonyM > > Its a thought. > > *TWO config modes ...* > > Config 1 - that adds the editing tools to enable the PMario Custom Markup > explicitly (i.e for any user) > > Config 2 - that adds the tool BUT adds NOTHING to the editor. I'm thinking > of cases where USER needs basic usage but NOT to ever see complexity of > PMario Custom Markup system. > > Thoughts on real utility (never add visible tools an end-user does not > need). > TT > > On Friday, 25 September 2020 10:26:40 UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> Ciao TonyM >> >> As ever from you an inclusive, broad reply. >> >> I'm actually wondering a slightly different way. Narrower. But very real. >> ... For instance ... >> >> *Does it matter if an end-user on web has the markup character in a font?* >> >> Personally I like to use glyphs from any of the UTF-16 doable Unicode >> (=Unicode “Basic Multilingual Plane”, choice of 55k plus characters). That >> way you can have symbols that actually have *meaning* (open, close, >> paragraph, section etc). I have local fonts available for that. So *I* will >> see them in TW (OS font substitution or explicit invoke in TW settings). A >> user may not; likely will not. >> >> BUT, since the BESPOKE markup is mine for my use they DO NOT need to have >> the font for the markup character since they will NEVER edit a Tiddler in >> an application I build using this approach. that would be blocked. Its for >> reading, not editing. >> >> In any case it would not be compatible with providing, on-line, >> *editable* TW. >> BUT it is GOOD from point of view of author making TW for USE, not edit, >> by users. >> >> I think this comment encapsulates my point well enough? >> >> Regarding the OP I am wondering a bit about whether PMario's setting of >> the "base glyphs" to be in a "European language" font is necessary. >> >> Its a thought :-) I'll expand on a bit later. >> >> Best wishes >> TT >> >> >> TonyM wrote: >>> >>> TT, >>> >>> >>>> But, as I work with it myself I sometimes struggle with the >>>> PERMUTATIONS possible. >>>> >>> >>> This is so often the case in tiddlywiki, the customisations and >>> possibilities are virtually infinite in many directions. >>> This is just another few dimensions of control. >>> >>> >>>> My main wondering is WHO is it FOR, mainly? >>>> >>> >>> Just as for tiddlywiki, we will not know except through lived >>> experience. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/7e09e227-ea21-4998-9d57-805f64626752o%40googlegroups.com.
