*Regarding fonts ...*

 @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>  
>
>> 2 - SOME NOTES ON FONT SUPPORT - PMario & I already briefly discussed 
>> this. 
>> Its not an issue on the 6 IDs, at least not for European languages. 
>>
>> But it *is an issue if you want to use Unicode characters in \customize 
>> pragma*.
>>
>  <snip>

>
>> My point for TW? I'm wondering IF, we could assemble a *custom font *of 
>> say 100 Unicode *typographic *signs (e.g. punctuation marks, markup 
>> symbols, reference signs etc)  and *EMBED* this in a TW?
>>
>
>
PMario ... 

> I'm not the biggest fan of embedded fonts, because of size. ... BUT it 
> will be possible with a second plugin, so users can decide.
>

I agree for complete fonts. I should look at *how big a font of, say, 100 
characters is?*

<snip>

I personally would install the font. 
>

On computer? Yes. But I'm just wondering if a more TW-centric approach 
would be viable too? (i.e. the embed route, IF font of limited character 
set is small enough?)
 

>  
>
>> Q: Is it possible? Your thoughts?
>>
>  

> I would even consider to create a browser AddOn, that will make the font 
> available for TWs, if users don't want to install new system fonts. 
> I'm not sure if this is possible, but it would be worth a test. 
>

That's encouraging! I had thought it would be very difficult.  

Best wishes
TT

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/691478a9-fcca-40bd-8ddb-726554480aceo%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to