*Regarding fonts ...* @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > >> 2 - SOME NOTES ON FONT SUPPORT - PMario & I already briefly discussed >> this. >> Its not an issue on the 6 IDs, at least not for European languages. >> >> But it *is an issue if you want to use Unicode characters in \customize >> pragma*. >> > <snip>
> >> My point for TW? I'm wondering IF, we could assemble a *custom font *of >> say 100 Unicode *typographic *signs (e.g. punctuation marks, markup >> symbols, reference signs etc) and *EMBED* this in a TW? >> > > PMario ... > I'm not the biggest fan of embedded fonts, because of size. ... BUT it > will be possible with a second plugin, so users can decide. > I agree for complete fonts. I should look at *how big a font of, say, 100 characters is?* <snip> I personally would install the font. > On computer? Yes. But I'm just wondering if a more TW-centric approach would be viable too? (i.e. the embed route, IF font of limited character set is small enough?) > > >> Q: Is it possible? Your thoughts? >> > > I would even consider to create a browser AddOn, that will make the font > available for TWs, if users don't want to install new system fonts. > I'm not sure if this is possible, but it would be worth a test. > That's encouraging! I had thought it would be very difficult. Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/691478a9-fcca-40bd-8ddb-726554480aceo%40googlegroups.com.