I don't see this as something we have to "support" in the sense of shipping binaries based on it. It's more for developers who need to build on systems that have Xorg 1.1. Can't you just #ifdef around the offending code?
However, I also am OK with using build-xorg-git, if it can be made to work with Xorg 1.5. Adam Tkac wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 04:15:40AM -0500, DRC wrote: > >> I checked in a patch which seems to allow me to build Xvnc on RHEL 5 >> using the Xorg server 1.1 branch. Using this patch, I do: >> > > Hm, I think more about this issue and in the end it seems that older > releases of Xorg are not so good idea. Main problem is that they are > unmaintained and might contain serious bugs. Thus we should definitely > not ship Xvnc which is based on old Xorg branch. > > More wise solution might be to use XFree86 source, I think (I saw they > released 4.8.0 12/15/2008). Let me check how big pain will be port > xvnc.cc to XFree86 4.8.0. > > Adam > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
