On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 05:18:11AM -0500, DRC wrote: > I don't see this as something we have to "support" in the sense of > shipping binaries based on it. It's more for developers who need to > build on systems that have Xorg 1.1. Can't you just #ifdef around the > offending code?
You could try it but it won't work. > However, I also am OK with using build-xorg-git, if it can be made to > work with Xorg 1.5. Yes, I discussed this solution with Pierre on IRC and it will be the preferred solution. I'm working on it. > Adam Tkac wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 04:15:40AM -0500, DRC wrote: > > > >> I checked in a patch which seems to allow me to build Xvnc on RHEL 5 > >> using the Xorg server 1.1 branch. Using this patch, I do: > >> > > > > Hm, I think more about this issue and in the end it seems that older > > releases of Xorg are not so good idea. Main problem is that they are > > unmaintained and might contain serious bugs. Thus we should definitely > > not ship Xvnc which is based on old Xorg branch. > > > > More wise solution might be to use XFree86 source, I think (I saw they > > released 4.8.0 12/15/2008). Let me check how big pain will be port > > xvnc.cc to XFree86 4.8.0. OK, after check XFree86 is definitely not a case. Adam -- Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
